
Hackathons have shaped some of the biggest names in tech.
Uniswap, Polygon, Instadapp, and even parts of Polkadot all started in hackathons.
But these are outliers.
The brutal truth? Most hackathon projects never make it past the weekend.
And that’s not because developers aren’t brilliant or ideas aren’t solid. It’s because the hackathon system is flawed.
ETHGlobal, one of the most prominent hackathon platforms in the Web3 space, has hosted 50+ global hackathons, led to the creation of 6,000+ projects, and distributed over $4.5M in prizes. Yet, how many of these projects turned into real businesses? The numbers tell a story: 70,000+ developers onboarded. 1,000+ hours of educational talks. $250M+ raised by hackathon-born companies. This means that despite thousands of projects being built, only a fraction survive long enough to raise funding. This is a wasted opportunity for Web3. If hackathons are meant to be launchpads, why do they feel more like idea graveyards?
Ten years ago, hackathons were rare, and winning one actually meant something.
Today, hackathons happen every weekend, across every sector, in every country.
Developers now have too many choices.
And because there’s no global standard for quality, they waste time building for events that don’t actually help them grow.
Unlike Y Combinator, which has a proven track record of launching successful startups, hackathons don’t have a consistent track record of producing real businesses.
The result? Developers end up optimizing for short-term wins instead of real-world impact.
Winning a hackathon doesn’t mean your idea has a future—it just means you built something cool in a short amount of time.
But after the event, reality kicks in:
Even the best projects fizzle out because hackathons are designed for short-term competition, not long-term execution.
Most venture capital firms don’t take hackathons seriously.
Why? Because there’s no filtering mechanism.
If you’re an investor looking for the next big thing, hackathons seem like noise:
This is a huge missed opportunity. Some of the best blockchain projects—Uniswap, Aave, and even Filecoin—were born in hackathons.
But they succeeded because their founders knew how to navigate the VC world, not because the hackathon gave them a pathway to funding.
There’s currently no system that connects the best hackathon projects with the right investors.
Most hackathons focus on technical innovation, not business viability.
This is why so many hackathon projects never turn into real products. They’re built to impress judges, not to survive in the market.
A real startup requires more than a strong GitHub repo.
It requires:
Right now, hackathons aren’t designed to help with any of that.
If hackathons are to remain relevant, we need structural changes.
Right now, there’s no way to track the long-term progress of hackathon projects.
We need a centralized, open-source repository where:
Imagine if every project that won a hackathon was required to maintain updates for six months.
This would create a public ledger of progress, separating serious founders from those who are just in it for the prize money.
2 - Post-Hackathon Acceleration
Winning should mean more than just a cash prize.
Hackathon organizers should commit to:
This is how real accelerator programs work. Hackathons need to borrow from that model.
Right now, big blockchain companies love sponsoring hackathons. https://x.com/ETHGlobal/status/1890447863886540998
But sponsorship isn’t enough.
What if every company that sponsors a hackathon agreed to adopt one project per event?
Incubate it > Fund it > Help integrate it into the ecosystem.
That’s how we turn hackathons into real innovation pipelines.
At Kalp Studio, we don’t just host hackathons.
We’re actively building an ecosystem where projects survive beyond the weekend.
Through BUILD Bharat Tour, we are:
And the results?
We’re not here to just host another hackathon. We’re here to change the model.
Hackathons have the potential to change industries—but not in their current form.
To make them real launchpads for innovation, we need:
1 - A global hackathon repository.
2 - A structured investment pipeline.
3 - Post-hackathon acceleration for top projects.
4 - More commitment from blockchain companies.
The next Uniswap, Polygon, or OpenSea is being built in a hackathon right now.
The question is: Will we let it die there?
Or will we build the infrastructure to make it thrive?
If you believe hackathons should be more than just a weekend event—let’s talk. Innovation deserves better.
It’s time to fix this.